In “Civil War Command and Strategy” Archer Jones does an excellent
job of painting the “big picture” of strategy in the Civil War. Jones examines
the command systems and leadership of both armies and describes the various
strategies that leaders used on both sides to attempt success.
There is much interesting discussion about concentration in space,
and concentration in time. The author provides solid examples of how each side
used these types of strategies while adjusting and evolving as the war
progressed. The South for example leaned toward concentrations in space early
in the war as Davis assembled large numbers in an attempt to secure his entire
front. Lincoln, on the other hand seemed to lean towards concentrations in time
attempting to coordinate much more difficult simultaneous advances of his
inactive generals. While difficult to achieve, these concentrations in time
eventually favored the larger army of the North. The Civil War was evolutionary
in these concepts because of the modern technology that the commanders had
available to execute these movements such as the steamboat, the telegraph, and
especially the railroad. Civil War
commanders, in their use of these types of logistics, eventually revolutionized
warfare, but they dragged traditional warfare into this evolutionary
process.
Traditional Napoleonic turning movements were at the heart of
military doctrine during the Civil War. Jones provides excellent diagrams and
examples that help one to easily visualize the intent and evolution of these
movements. It is especially interesting to see his examples of the use of the
movements through much of our history, even to the Gulf War, making the point
that although warfare has certainly evolved considerably since the days of
Napoleon, some good ideas are never out of date.
The use of raids, normally tied to Mosby and others from both
sides, is an interesting and important portion of the author’s work. Defining
key major actions of the war, such as Lee’s movement towards Antietam and
Gettysburg as “raids”, really puts this key component of strategy in
perspective. While on a grand scale--these were simply raids into enemy
territory. The Confederacy was the first to use raids, but both sides perfected
this strategy as Sherman’s march to the sea capped the war off.
During the Civil War, both sides eventually had effective command
structures, although there was much growing pain such as the “kaleidoscopic”
changes in command, never overcome in the Confederate Western Department, and
eventually overcome in the Federal Eastern Department. Still, according to the
author the ultimate overall field commanders, Lee and Grant “worked in great
harmony” with their Presidents. Davis had the advantage here however because he
found his General early on, while Lincoln’s quest took some time. In the end
though, Lincoln’s General with his tenacity and ample resources would balance
and ultimately outweigh the others on the playing field.
No comments:
Post a Comment