True,
the Confederates had to protect their capitol of Richmond, and also true, the
war in the east posed the greatest threat to the Federals and the highest
visibility to the Europeans and the potential for their support. But the Federal success in the west, and the
Confederate failure in the west led to the fledgling nations downfall.
First, the Confederates lost out on
the vast amounts of supply that could have been gained from the west. When the
Federals shut down the western supply lines by taking the Mississippi, this
stopped a potently large pool of resources and money for the Confederates—the
gold of California and other western states could have been ripe for the
picking. Second, when the Mississippi was shut down the Federals had open
access to attack inland at whatever point they choice—in affect rolling up the
Confederates left flank. These combined results placed a choke hold on the
Confederacies left flank, combined with the naval blockade on the right flank.
True, the Confederates only had to hold on to win the war, but open access to
the west would have greatly increased their abilities to do this.
If
the Confederates would have put more emphasis on the west, they might have been
able to hold on longer increasing the possibility that they would have been
granted their independence by the war-weary Union. Also, if Sherman would have
been stopped at Atlanta by a stronger, larger Confederate force, the outcome of
the 1864 election would have more than likely ended up with McClellan as
President, and a peace settlement soon thereafter resulting in Confederate
independence.
No comments:
Post a Comment